Since no one in the corporate media is asking this question, and since the lead Democrat on the issue is from Burbank, we’re going to ask it again:
When reports came out last week that the CIA had determined Russia tried “to influence” the last election, does this mean that they just engaged in going after email accounts? Or is there evidence that they attempted to do something else besides?
The media is herd-like glomming onto the “leaked emails” story because that’s what they do. We also suspect that they’re deliberately avoiding any mention of other more sinister possibilities because — well — that’s what they always do as well. They’re going to avoid going after anything more suggestive, at least if doing so is against the interests of a Republican.
But if this were Hillary of course they’d be demanding her resignation. The Office is compromised!
So what is it. The mass presumption here is that this is just about “emails.” But is that an accurate one?