Apparently Fronnie has learned more about the ins and outs and the “who knew what and when” of the Angel email incident than the council, right here.
The big question: if it’s true that he’s the one who initiated the whole thing, how did this attorney first hear about these emails?
Did someone else down there receive them as well, and at the time they were first sent? Or had stories been going around about them?
Notice too that the City only used a 30-word identifier to flag the desired results. And only “five were deemed inappropriate.”
Who made that decision, and what criteria was used?
Rogers tonight also wants to know if there was a larger sample, and he wants staff to tell them what else is out there. Was anything left out, and is anything being held back?