Only what’s fit to print

Keep in mind that this is from the same guy who for some reason will not run the weeks-old story about two Burbank elected officials suddenly deciding to quit their jobs:

I decided to ask a deceptively easy question.

“What is news?” I asked the Glendale Community College class. “For instance, Kim Kardashian announced she’d like to be mayor of Glendale. Is that news?”

“NO!” came the cry from the majority of the class. “It’s a waste of time! A waste of space!”

“Of course it’s news,” I replied. “It’s interesting.”

Gary Montecuollo, GCC’s police chief, teaches the community relations class. The larger goal, he said, is to show how different parts of our city interact and interrelate. Since one of those cogs, so to speak, is the media, he asked me to come and talk about my job.

At first, I wasn’t really sure what to talk about. Fortunately, Ms. Kardashian did me a solid. Despite the students’ insistence that her political aspirations are of no interest, our paper’s Web traffic has spiked.

No comment. What can you possible say about something this inane?

This, in turn, highlighted the tensions journalists often face: to inform but also entertain, to expose wrongdoing without being gossipy, and to balance between the important and the interesting.

“Do you know what makes something newsworthy?” I asked the class.

Silence. To be fair, I think I threw them off with the Kardashian question.

“In general, something is newsworthy because a news outlet broadcasts or publishes it,” I said. “In general, because we say it is.”

It sounds a bit recursive, I’ll admit. But it is also true, and underscores the need for reflection and, often, self-restraint on the part of journalists. Sometimes the subjects of news stories would prefer we not write about them; other times they essentially beg for coverage.

And sometimes a story has so much importance, it must be printed despite whatever shame or embarrassment it causes. Other times, printing a small truth can hide a bigger lie, and journalists have to ensure they aren’t being played by their sources.

Apparently to these people you need to have a victory in court several times before you’ll get much coverage. And even then there’s a lot of handwringing. Because you just don’t want to go too far with things, do you?

BTW, the kids show a lot more sense, don’t they?

Now here’s a fun one:

To exemplify this, I asked the class to break into several small groups. I gave them an ethical quandary — one this paper faced — and asked them what they would do.

Here’s the dilemma: You discover that a woman has fallen from the top of a hotel downtown. Though it happened after midnight, a number of people witnessed the fall, and police are investigating it as a possible suicide.

Though police decline to say much of anything, you find the night manager of the hotel. The manager asks not to be quoted, but gives you the name of the woman and tells you that she requested “the highest floor available.”

With this information, I asked the class, what details to you choose to print, or do you print anything at all?

The debate was loud and spirited. Though many of the members of the class would have printed everything — including the name — a few decided it would be best to not print anything at all.

(What the paper did do, by the way, was to print a small story, a brief, stating that a woman had fallen from a hotel room, and that the matter was being investigated as a suicide. We did not name the woman or write any follow-up stories.)

Now which other local blogger was it that tried to get the name of this jumper as well, only to be refused by the BPD?

That was a red flag right there. When something like this happens it’s obvious that both the newspaper and the city are covering for the identity of the victim. So Evans can be as phony-pious as he wants to be, but his paper’s refusal to identify the jumper had nothing to do with “ethics” but everything to do with protecting other people.

Because suicide is the ultimate “fuck-you,” anyone doing it this way would have wanted to promote the hell out of it. So they weren’t doing her the favor.

Now if Kim Kardashian had jumped off the Holiday Inn instead, that would have been news.




Filed under Uncategorized

11 responses to “Only what’s fit to print

  1. chad

    What in god’s name does “Ms. Kardashian did me a solid” mean? Was she having loose bowel movements for a while? Also let’s not be tautologically redundant by repeating ourselves when saying, ” ‘In general, something is newsworthy because a news outlet broadcasts or publishes it,’ I said. ‘In general, because we say it is.’ “

    • semichorus

      I think that’s hip journalism talk.

      (or maybe it was a hard-on– butshe does nothing for me. I can find a dozen girls much cuter than her down at the neighborhood Starbucks. She also gives lousy head.)

  2. Anonymous

    Why won’t the paper print the story about the resignations?

    • DixieFlyer

      Under “normal” circumstances at a “normal” Local Community Newspaper (note the use of News!!)
      the occasion of ONE Elected Official offering their Resignation–let alone TWO–would generate an initial announcement, then followed by information relative to the process leading to their replacement.

      These are the same Clowns that refused to believe that the Burbank City Council adopted Agenda 21 from the United Nations.

      Minutes of the meeting were a “fake”, giving credit to the maker of the Motion was a “scurrilous attack” and bringing up the subject was “laughable”.

      As semi has pointed out the “administrative dilemma” has tied the City Council in knots.

      Without “direction” from the City, the follower found themselves “paralyzed”.

  3. chad

    Isn’t this stuff taught in a middle school civics class?

  4. checking in

    and then when a Burbank High minor commits suicide outside of Burbank it rates 3 stories on the website and a large photo on the front page of the paper. Nothing like being consistent – especially by using his name since it was released by the district.

    • semichorus

      You’re right.

      But we all know they’re not just inconsistent. They lie. Look how they violated their own policy about not running big stories or letters about the candidates right before the election. And so they do hit piece on Gabel-Luddy’s opponent four days before the polls close– and after they endorsed Gabel-Luddy.

      • Burbanker

        These comments by this Evans character make no intelligent sense at all. Bottom line this dude Evans thinks he is news king and he decides what is and what is not news. Some of the biggest stories in Burbank history have broken during his watch. Things like the police department corruption not to mention things like two recent trial verdicts that show that not one but two juries really don’t believe the city of Burbank’s stories. Now the resignation o the city clerk and the resignation of the city treasurer. Maybe he feels resignations and losses in jury trials are as confidential as a suicide ? But wait why do I suspect if the juries had found in favor of the city it would be top story news for days ?

        • semichorus

          And when they did run the lawsuit stories they framed them from the point-of-view of the city. Especially the Taylor courtroom action, where they centered on how he allegedly did or did not do this or that.

          Not the city’s omissions– but Taylor’s ! As propounded by the city!

        • semichorus

          Oh yeah. They’d be sending David Laurell to the celebration parties.

      • DixieFlyer

        “The same clowns, the same lazy rag.”

Leave a Reply- (comments take a while to appear)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s