Brett Loutensock has always been Dave Golonski’s stooge

We laughed out loud when we discovered that Burbank Police Commissioner James Etter’s accuser in this so-called threat-gate controversy is none other than Brett Loutensock (!)

How much more transparent can these people get? It doesn’t take a genius to figure out how many establishment people have hated Etter from the beginning, and are now itching for a chance to toss him on his keister. Golonski proved this last year when he called for a special council vote to “reconsider” their just-made appointment, and it was all because of a personal run-in he’d had years earlier with James’ late brother Bob. The two are both lookalikes and soundalikes and this drives Golonski totally nuts.

So now we have a pretextual legal “incident” in front of the council that gives them another chance to get rid of the guy, so that they can replace him with a management toady? Give us a break.

One thing the Leader doesn’t mention in their story is that Etter’s accuser, Brett Loutensock, has been one of Dave Golonski’s longtime tenants. A few years after he came onto the council, Golonski was somehow able to buy a nice set of apartment buildings from another well-connected local investor. Loutensock became a tenant in one of them, and may still be to this day.

This kind of changes things when it comes to the sincerity department, doesn’t it? It shows that this is hardly the serious complaint of an impartial and concerned citizen. Rather, for years Loutensock has functioned as one of Golonski’s two-bit political operatives. Just writing this down makes us laugh, because even though it’s true, the mere use of these words to describe such a haplessly hamfisted duo sounds ridiculous on its face. It gives them way too much credit, but operatives they are.

Loutensock has a very sleazy past with Golonski. It began quite a few years ago, back when he went out of his way to stage a completely phony legal case down at the Coral Cafe on Burbank Blvd. Long a hangout for local union members and a number of council critics, the Coral had just tossed Golonski friend and former Leader columnist Will Rogers off the premises one morning when he tried to crash a private meet-and-greet event sponsored by Carolyn Berlin.

Knowing a setup when she saw one, Berlin had no interest in allowing Rogers to attend her event just so that he could disrupt it to pieces and then go back and lie about them in his column. The Coral was also the longtime daily hangout of the late Ted McConkey, who at the time was the nemesis of our local-family power structure (one of the things we’re most sorry about in life, BTW, is that McConkey didn’t live long enough to see these people get their comeuppance, along with being nailed from the outside– although he predicted it).

So what Loutensock was trying to do was set up the Coral with a phony discrimination case, because its proprietors had always been protecting the anti-Golonski city critics in their hangout. They’d also just thrown Rogers out of the joint during another recent incident, when he’d driven down there to confront McConkey at breakfast time about some ludicrous election conspiracy he’d been fantasizing about.

Loutensock trains seeing-eye dogs (reputedly), so after the Coral throws him out of the place because he was trying to drag an animal through the dining room, landlord Golonski then goes nuts and makes a huge public deal about it, just as if they’d been George Wallace standing in front of the university doorway or something. He even gathers together a group of his friends and supporters to “picket” the joint over this incident– and we put the word in quotes, because a more pathetic and embarrassing spectacle can hardly be imagined.

Just picture a couple of middle-aged guys in shorts with tiny little protest signs all prancing around trying to look angry, along with their haggard and even angrier-looking wives, and you’ll get a good idea of the extent of this ridiculousness. They looked like Dad night at the Finbar Fiesta.

Loutensock also has the peculiar habit of suddenly showing up at council meetings or in the letters section of the Leader whenever Golonski needs community backup on some pet complaint. And by coincidence, his naive mutterings always sound exactly like something G’ has just said a few days earlier, although without the same college-words it’s a lot more confused and brain-numbing. A more reliable knee-jerk could not be hoped-for by Dave.

So when Loutensock goes down to City Hall and attacks Jim Etter for these so-called character and ethics issues, and then goes nuts in outrage after Etter starts to fight back, just remember that this is all part of a hamfisted setup-stunt from the Golonski-Flad-Barlow contingent. The outspoken and unconventional Etter is a threat to them, so what better way to eliminate him than to engineer a phony legal issue? We’re sure one of those dishonest, absolute-immunity Barlow prosecution letters is close behind. These people are getting more and more desperate in their tactics.

Did we ever mention why Dave Golonski hated Etter’s brother so much? One of the reasons is that Bob Etter used to go around and claim that Golonski’s wife was actually his cousin of some sort (Golonski’s) , and that they were only in a common-law marriage of convenience. This used to drive Golonski absolutely crazy– which made it funny enough– but Etter always claimed he had the goods on them.

In the end, Bob Etter got sued by our thin-skinned, carpetbagging, maybe-common-law retired computer programmer, and apparently for some imagined harassment incident that saw the same Mrs. Golonski so upset and frightened about Etter driving by their house that she was compelled to rush outside one morning and chase him down the street. That’s how terrified she was of him.

Bob Etter eventually had to pay Golonski’s attorney’s fees after a prolonged legal battle, but we heard he never did so in the end, so you can chalk this up as one more reason why his brother Jim is getting the shaft.

Advertisements

14 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

14 responses to “Brett Loutensock has always been Dave Golonski’s stooge

  1. Masked

    You got it all wrong he’s a mover and shaker in the community.

    On the other side of town, 2010 celebrations continued as former Mayor Mary Lou Howard once again opened her beautiful hillside home to celebrate the arrival of the new year.

    During the 1990s and early years of the new millennium, Howard’s New Year’s Eve parties grew into elaborate themed affairs in which hundreds of the city’s formally dressed movers and shakers experienced a night that rivaled presidential inaugural balls or Academy Award galas. Reaching a point that she could no longer outdo herself, Howard has since scaled back her New Year’s Eve celebration into a more exclusive dinner party.

    Among the revelers who joined Burbank’s first female mayor to ring in the new year were Mayor Gary Bric and his wife, Shelly, Airport Commissioner Don Brown, Burbank Water and Power General Manager Ron Davis and his wife, Cheryl, and former Burbank Fire Chief Mike Davis and his wife, JoAnn.

    Others in attendance included Jon Howard, Ernie Burger, Jack O’Neill, Josie Kowatch, Kathleen Lindblom and her husband, Bryon Hillesland, Bruce Redmann, Max Andrews, Joe and Joy Valeno, Brett Loutensock, Ned Price, Bob and Lee Paysinger, Henry and Kirsten Okland, and Harry and Ellie Myer.

  2. Dirty Mary2

    When I saw this guy on Channel 6, I immediately knew this is the same guy I’ve seen helping Golonske with the destruction of political signs during Burbank campaigns. He is another one of the real “bad apples” in town rotten to the core who must get rewarded with free rent from Golonske.

  3. Hercules

    I was watching Channel 6 and I always see this grubby guy wearing a blue Hawaiian shirt at city council meetings. I knew he was a “bad apple” because I always see him smoking in the Burbank Village area. This character is rude with his second hand smoke. I hope the police cite this character.

    • Dirty Mary2

      Herc,

      Loutensocks only shows up at Council meetings when he is beckoned by Golonske, he’s not there all the time and I have never seen him in a Hawaiian shirt. Golonske has him in tow to help with his dirty work, and usually they are both dressed very grubby on the weekends. Just look around during this next election, I’m sure you will see them out and about doing their nasty deeds to candidates they dislike. They may even have a little red wagon in tow.

      • semichorus

        I think “herc’ was talking about Nolan. Loutensock’s the one with the dogs.

        I’ve never commented before about G’s informal dress, but yes, it is pretty tacky. A lot more low rent than I’d expected. I’d never go out that way– and I’m me.

  4. Masked

    You want to inhale some smoke check out the smokers patio at Barney’s Beanery Downtown in the no smoking Village, right? Oh and their drinking alcohol too! so you won’t want to be driving the streets with all those bad apples out there just stay home.
    Now go back to finishing your homework must of been extra credit for posting, mommy must work for the City.

  5. Hercules

    Father Masked, do you not smoke outside of city hall too? I hear that it is not the only thing you smoke. We all know you like the young ones.

    • semichorus

      I love how the city defenders always get their gadflies mixed up…

      and BTW, this Father Gadfly that you are referring to got a nice settlement from his old employer. They were wrong and he was right.

  6. Sara Smile

    What about Mike Nolan who is Marylou Howard’s stooge. Of course, he has to be her call boy because she gives little Mikey his lunch money and gives him a place to live and wipes his hiney.

  7. Dirty Mary2

    Looks like the “worms” in the real “bad apples” have come out today.

  8. Hercules

    DM2,

    That is a bunch of fiddle faddle!

Leave a Reply- (comments take a while to appear)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s